Case Studies

Technical AEC research hub

Case Studies

These case studies analyze commercial architectural faucets deployed in high-traffic and regulated environments such as healthcare, hospitality, transportation, education, and civic buildings. The focus is on hydraulic performance, compliance frameworks, control systems, durability, water-quality risk, commissioning, and long-term facility operations. No sales positioning is included.

Commercial / Institutional Field-verified Evidence-based No sales positioning

Reader orientation

Audience
Architects • Engineers • Specifiers
Lens
Performance + Compliance + Ops
Outputs
Case studies • Metrics • Controls
Use stage
Spec • Commissioning • O&M

Published Authority Sources

ASME A112.18.1/CSA B125.1 overview
DOE FEMP purchasing guidance
EPA WaterSense (bathroom faucets)
NSF/ANSI 61 overview

How to Read These Case Studies

What to extract for specifications and operations

Scope

What these case studies cover These studies focus on commercial architectural faucets in environments where performance and compliance are operational requirements—not marketing claims. Coverage prioritizes hydraulic performance, code and certification frameworks, control logic, durability under aggressive cleaning and heavy use, water-quality risk at the point of use, commissioning verification, and long-term facility maintenance realities.

Scope

The goal is to support AEC decision-making with engineering context, measurable criteria, and coordination implications across project types.

Hydraulics
pressure variability + delivered flow
Compliance
frameworks + coordination outcomes
Operations
commissioning + maintenance planning

Baseline Standards Referenced Across Studies Shared reference framework Each case study uses a consistent baseline so results and spec implications remain comparable across project types and operating conditions. The emphasis is on how standards and benchmarks translate into field performance, commissioning verification, and maintainability.

Standards and benchmarks commonly referenced include:

ASME A112.18.1/CSA B125.1 for plumbing supply fitting performance, materials, and endurance
Public lavatory water-efficiency benchmarks (commonly 0.5 gpm targets in federal/owner standards)
WaterSense program context influencing owner expectations and procurement language
NSF/ANSI 61 for components in contact with potable water
Commissioning verification of delivered flow, mixed temperature, and control behavior
Lifecycle service planning, spare parts standardization, and access strategy

Standards and Compliance

ASME/CSA

Supply fitting performance baseline Most commercial faucets in North America are evaluated against ASME A112.18.1/CSA B125.1 for materials, structural integrity, flow performance, and endurance testing.

ASME A112.18.1/CSA B125.1 Plumbing Supply Fittings
CSA store listing (B125.1)

Federal

Public lavatory efficiency targets Federal procurement and owner standards commonly target 0.5 gpm lavatory flow rates, especially in publicly funded or ESG-driven projects.

Federal Water-Efficient Faucet Purchasing Guidance
WaterSense at Work — Commercial faucets

WaterSense

Program influence + expectations WaterSense specifications influence owner expectations even when certification is not contractually required.

WaterSense Bathroom Faucets
WaterSense Product Specifications
Draft WaterSense Lavatory Faucet Specification Revisions

NSF/ANSI

Drinking water contact safety NSF/ANSI 61 is frequently referenced for components in contact with potable water.

NSF/ANSI 61 Drinking Water System Components
NSF/ANSI 61 (educational PDF)

Hospitality Portfolio Retrofit

Water and energy audit methodology (GROHE) Large hotel portfolios commonly face: Inconsistent fixture performance across properties Rising operational costs Pressure sensitivity and variable user experience Unreliable water and energy modeling from rated-flow assumptions Excessive run times in manual and early-generation low-flow fixtures Commissioning gaps that persist across portfolio rollouts Audit-based fixture selection and lifecycle planning Engineering approach emphasizes measured performance and durability inputs: Measured consumption, hot-water ratios, and behavioral assumptions—not manufacturer-rated flow alone Cartridge cycling, solenoid endurance, and material fatigue testing integrated into lifecycle cost analysis Field verification of dynamic pressure to manage upstream instability amplified by low-flow endpoints Post-install validation of delivered flow, mixed temperature, and sensor shutoff behavior Reference set GROHE Water and Energy Audit Case Study • GROHE Project Planning Documentation (PDF) • ArchFaucet: Water-saving faucet benchmarking

Project photo 1

Measured Savings

Sensor-operated faucets in institutional buildings Municipal and institutional facilities often compare sensor-controlled fixtures versus manual valves using measured, multi-building performance data. Evidence frameworks emphasize real-world consumption behavior, not just rated flow.

Independent, multi-building analysis of sensor faucet performance under real-world conditions
Key metric: gallons per handwashing event
True consumption reduction is driven by controlled run time—not flow alone
Sensor-Operated Fixtures Final Report (2010)
EPA: WaterSense at Work (faucets)

Specification implications Increasingly, teams specify maximum event volume and automatic shutoff logic rather than relying on rated flow alone—especially where user behavior variability is high.

Maximum runtime limits and automatic shutoff criteria
Commissioning checks for delivered event volume under site pressure conditions
Controls alignment with owner expectations and maintenance access realities

Project photo 2

Healthcare Integration

Hygiene benefits vs water quality risk (KOHLER) Hospitals and outpatient facilities specify touchless faucets for infection control and user compliance. However, touchless fixtures can increase stagnation at the point of use if flushing behavior is not addressed and aligned with the facility Water Management Plan.

Commercial touchless faucet systems with integrated controls and serviceable components
Water management integration: sensor logic, flushing schedules, and temperature control alignment
Commissioning validation tied to operating conditions—not just initial startup
Peer-reviewed evidence on microbial water quality impacts associated with sensor-operated faucets
Risk framing that connects fixture controls to distribution strategy and use patterns
Operations: access for service, programming control, and verification intervals

Engineering controls Integration is not just “power and water.” It includes:

Flushing schedules and stagnation mitigation aligned with the Water Management Plan
Temperature control coordination with mixing strategy and delivery requirements
Programming access, locked settings, and verification during closeout
Ongoing validation under real occupancy and use behavior

CDC: Legionella Water Management Program toolkit
ASHRAE 188 (Legionellosis risk management)
Peer-reviewed study: microbial dynamics in touchless faucets
ArchFaucet: Healthcare faucet specification guide

Project photo 3

Maintainability

Modular sensor faucet systems and service workflows (American Standard) Education and civic buildings often require standardized maintenance workflows. Case study focus is on modular electronics, accessible control boxes, predictable service parts, and practical power strategies.

Modular electronics with accessible components
Predictable service parts and standardized replacement identifiers
Installation documentation supporting field usability and troubleshooting
Power strategy evaluation: hardwired vs battery based on access, labor, and lifecycle cost

Documentation and installation emphasis Teams assess submittals and closeout documentation for:

Control box access and service clearances
Wiring, power conversion, and vandal resistance considerations
Repeatable commissioning checks across multiple restroom cores
Spare parts standardization to reduce downtime

American Standard Selectronic modular system
Spec sheet: auto purge + safety timer (PDF)

How to Read These Case Studies

What to extract for specifications and operations These studies are written to translate evidence into spec language and field-verifiable outcomes. The objective is to isolate what impacts performance: hydraulics, controls, commissioning, maintainability, and water-quality management—not brand positioning.

Team member portrait

Retrofit ROI and Operational Savings Framing (FontanaShowers)

Retrofit ROI and Operational Savings Framing (FontanaShowers)

Savings claims must be validated against actual occupancy, hot-water distribution losses, and maintenance inputs. Use case studies to check assumptions and require verification methods—not just projected percent reductions.

Touchless faucet energy and cost savings context

Team member portrait

Sensor Performance and User Behavior Reliability (BathSelect)

Sensor Performance and User Behavior Reliability (BathSelect)

In high-traffic public restrooms with vandalism risk, specify adjustable sensing range, maximum runtime cutoff, and locked programming settings. Evaluate behavior under real reflectivity, basin geometry, and user variability.

Sensor performance analysis (IR vs ToF)

Team member portrait

Technical Appendix

Defining commercial architectural faucets

Commercial classification is established through:

Compliance testing and documentation
Duty-cycle endurance and survivability under heavy use
Maintainability and predictable parts strategy
Commissioning verification and operational alignment

Commercial vs decorative survivability in semi-commercial spaces (JunoShowers) Design-forward hospitality and amenity spaces require guardrails: durability testing, compliance documentation, serviceability, and spare parts availability define true commercial suitability.

ArchFaucet: Residential vs commercial durability

Core definition and key standards Key references commonly cited include:

ASME A112.18.1/CSA B125.1 Plumbing Supply Fittings
Federal Water-Efficient Faucet Purchasing Guidance
Touchless faucet water quality research + WMP context (CDC)

Use this appendix to anchor spec language in measurable criteria: performance, controls, commissioning, and long-term operations.

How to read each study

Context building type + duty cycle Metrics delivered flow + event volume Controls logic, shutoff, flushing Ops service paths + parts strategy What “good” looks like in the field Studies prioritize conditions that drive real outcomes, including: Dynamic pressure verification at endpoints Delivered (not rated) flow confirmation after installation Mixed temperature behavior during typical use Sensor shutoff logic and runtime settings under real user behavior Water-quality controls aligned with Water Management Plans Service access, labor time, and predictable parts availability Each study translates observations into specification implications: how to write criteria, what to verify at commissioning, and what to standardize for long-term operations.