Sensor Technology in Faucets: Infrared vs Time-of-Flight—Which Is Better for Your Project

Why Sensor Technology Choice Matters in AEC Projects

Sensor-operated faucets are now standard in commercial and institutional settings, driven by hygiene expectations, water-use regulations, and accessibility requirements. The underlying sensor technology—Infrared (IR) or Time-of-Flight (ToF)—directly affects:

Most commercial faucets today use either traditional infrared reflectivity sensing or newer optical Time-of-Flight distance sensing. Both approaches can meet building codes, but their behavior differs significantly in real-world architectural conditions.


Infrared Sensor Taps

Principle of Operation

Infrared sensors emit near-infrared light and detect changes in reflected intensity when a user’s hands enter the basin area. Activation requires a certain threshold of reflected light, which makes the system sensitive to:

Strengths of IR

Limitations of IR

Because IR is dependent on reflectivity, performance differs with finishes and lighting:

These factors reflect the commissioning time and long-term stability of operation.


Time-of-Flight (ToF) Sensor Faucets

Operating Principle

Time-of-Flight sensors measure the time for a pulsed or modulated beam of light to return from a target, generating an actual distance measurement instead of relying on reflected brightness.

This allows the detection zone to be defined as a precise distance window, independent of reflectance.

Performance Characteristics

ToF provides:

These characteristics make ToF highly reliable in complex interiors such as public transit hubs, healthcare facilities, and modern corporate environments with glossy materials.

Resistance and Ingress Protection

Many ToF sensor pods are sealed to IP65 or IP67, offering:


Accessibility and ADA Considerations

Core ADA Requirements

ADA and U.S. Access Board guidance require that faucet controls:

Useful references:

IR vs. ToF for Accessibility

Sensor faucets inherently support operable-part requirements. However, ToF provides a more predictable activation zone, which helps people:

IR may require hands to be closer to the spout depending on basin geometry and lighting conditions.


Water Efficiency: WaterSense and CALGreen

WaterSense

WaterSense labeled bathroom sink faucets shall meet:

References:

Sensor type is not regulated; performance depends on how consistently the faucet activates and shuts off. ToF usually reduces “run-on” due to more precise detection.

CALGreen

CALGreen lists the maximum flow rates for nonresidential faucets:

References:

ToF helps maintain perceived responsiveness at lower flow rates by avoiding false activations.


ASME and Mechanical/Electrical Standards

Commercial faucets shall be listed to:

References:

The full assembly—including the electronic valve, sensor pod, and housing—should be certified. Electrical components typically require UL/IEC safety and EMC compliance.


Comparative Engineering Analysis

Detection Behavior

Infra-red:

Time-of-Flight:

Durability

Basically, it is better sealed and more stable against:

IR modules are designed differently and, therefore, more recalibrations are needed.

Water and Energy Performance

IR faucets can create more ghost activations.

Tof is offering more predictable shut-off behaviour.

Supports more accurate modeling of water efficiency for LEED, CALGreen, or WaterSense projects

Maintenance

IR is sensitive, requiring tuning based on finishes or changes in lighting.

ToF uses fixed thresholds over distance-easier to standardize fleet-wide

ToF provides better telemetry input for restrooms.

System Integration and BMS/IoT

Modern facilities often incorporate plumbing devices into digital ecosystems for:

ToF modules provide cleaner, more stable input data for analytics, allowing for better control logic and facility reporting.


Practical Specification Guidelines

When IR Is Appropriate

Indicated Use of ToF

The details that must be included in the specifications are:


Recommendation for AEC Teams

Architects

Mechanical Engineers

Owners & Facility Managers


Conclusion

Time-of-Flight sensing provides superior stability, lower false activation rates, and predictable commissioning outcomes across diverse architectural conditions. Infrared remains viable for simpler, matte-finish, static-lighting installations. Both technologies can be fully code-compliant, but ToF offers a more resilient and future-ready solution—particularly for high-traffic, design-intensive, or performance-driven commercial projects.

DimensionInfrared (IR) FaucetsTime-of-Flight (ToF) Faucets
Sensing principleDetects reflected IR brightness.Measures distance via light travel time.
Finish & color sensitivityPerformance varies with shiny, dark, or matte surfaces.Largely independent of color/finish.
Lighting sensitivityAffected by daylight, glare, and lighting changes.More stable under varied lighting.
False activationsWider detect cone; more ghost activations, especially in troughs.Tighter zone, fewer false triggers.
Durability / sealingSealing level varies by product.Often IP65–IP67, better for harsh cleaning.
Accessibility behaviorActivation point can shift with finishes/lighting.Predictable activation zone, helpful for ADA users.
Water performanceMore run-on, harder to model savings.Predictable shut-off, supports CALGreen/WaterSense goals.
Best suited forControlled light, matte finishes, lowest first cost.High-traffic, design-intensive, BMS-connected and performance-driven projects.